METS-IR, a novel score to evaluate insulin sensitivity, is predictive of visceral adiposity and incident type 2 diabetes
Academic Article in Scopus
-
- Overview
-
- Identity
-
- Additional document info
-
- View All
-
Overview
abstract
-
© 2018 European Society of Endocrinology Printed in Great Britain.Objective: We developed a novel non-insulin-based fasting score to evaluate insulin sensitivity validated against the euglycemic¿hyperinsulinemic clamp (EHC). We also evaluated its correlation with ectopic fact accumulation and its capacity to predict incident type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). Design and methods: The discovery sample was composed by 125 subjects (57 without and 68 with T2D) that underwent an EHC. We defined METS-IR as Ln((2*G0)+TG0)*BMI)/(Ln(HDL-c)) (G0: fasting glucose, TG0: fasting triglycerides, BMI: body mass index, HDL-c: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol), and compared its diagnostic performance against the M-value adjusted by fat-free mass (MFFM) obtained by an EHC. METS-IR was validated in a sample with EHC data, a sample with modified frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT) data and a large cohort against HOMA-IR. We evaluated the correlation of the score with intrahepatic and intrapancreatic fat measured using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Subsequently, we evaluated its ability to predict incident T2D cases in a prospective validation cohort of 6144 subjects. Results: METS-IR demonstrated the better correlation with the MFFM (¿=¿0.622, P<0.001) and diagnostic performance to detect impaired insulin sensitivity compared to both EHC (AUC: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.78¿0.90) and the SI index obtained from the FSIVGTT (AUC: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.53¿0.81). METS-IR significantly correlated with intravisceral, intrahepatic and intrapancreatic fat and fasting insulin levels (P<0.001). After a two-year follow-up, subjects with METS-IR in the highest quartile (>50.39) had the highest adjusted risk to develop T2D (HR: 3.91, 95% CI: 2.25¿6.81). Furthermore, subjects with incident T2D had higher baseline METS-IR compared to healthy controls (50.2±10.2 vs 44.7±9.2, P<0.001). Conclusion: METS-IR is a novel score to evaluate cardiometabolic risk in healthy and at-risk subjects and a promising tool for screening of insulin sensitivity.
status
publication date
published in
Identity
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
PubMed ID
Additional document info
has global citation frequency
start page
end page
volume