Which ovarian reserve marker relates to embryo quality on day 3 and blastocyst; age, AFC, AMH?
Academic Article in Scopus
-
- Overview
-
- Identity
-
- Additional document info
-
- View All
-
Overview
abstract
-
© 2021, Sociedade Brasileira de Reproducao Assistida. All rights reserved.Objective: The aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate which ovarian reserve marker would be more reliable as the quality of the A + B embryos (day 3 and blastocyst). Methods: We ran a prospective study with 124 infertile women, aged 24-48 years, from 2017 to 2018. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to age and the subgroups were compared for AMH, AFC, number of A+B embryos. New division of the 3 groups was performed based on the AMH, and the subgroups were compared for age, AFC and number of A+B embryos. Finally, we divided the patients into 3 groups, based on the AFC, and we compared the subgroups for age, AMH and number of A+B embryos. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: When the 124 patients were divided according to age, we found a significant fall in an A+B embryo quality (day3; blastocyst) after 35 years (p<0.038; p<0.035), and more severely after 37 years (p<0.032; p<0.027). When the 124 patients were divided according to AMH, there was a significant fall in A+B embryo quality (day 3; blastocyst), with AMH<1ng/ml (p<0.023; p<0.021). When the 124 patients were divided according to AFC, there was a significant fall in A+B embryo quality (day 3; blastocyst) with AFC<7 (p<0.025; p<0.023). These markers had significant associations with embryo quality (p<0.005). Conclusion: Age, AFC and AMH have significant associations with A +B embryo quality on day 3 and blastocyst.
status
publication date
published in
Identity
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
PubMed ID
Additional document info
has global citation frequency
start page
end page
volume