Biliary reconstruction after choledochal cyst resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis on hepaticojejunostomy vs hepaticoduodenostomy
Academic Article in Scopus
Overview
Identity
Additional document info
View All
Overview
abstract
Choledochal cysts are a rare pediatric biliary pathology. Excision of the extrahepatic cyst and restoration of biliary-enteric continuity through either hepaticoduodenostomy (HD) or Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) is the mainstay treatment. This study aims to determine if either method provides an advantage. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted, identifying studies comparing hepaticojejunostomy to hepaticoduodenostomy in patients with choledochal cysts. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3. Nine studies were included, operative time was shorter ¿ 97.50 [¿ 172.31, ¿ 22.69] p = 0.01 and bleeding reduced ¿ 48.98 [¿ 88.25, ¿ 9.71] p = 0.01 in HD. HD was associated with shorter length of stay 2.18 [¿ 3.87, ¿ 0.50] p = 0.01 and similar cholangitis and reintervention rates. Time to a normal diet was similar between groups. Biliary reflux was seen more frequently in HD 19.14 [2.60, 140.63] p = 0.004. Complications such as leak and cholangitis were similar between groups. HD represents a viable alternative to HJ with various advantages such as shorter operative time, decreased bleeding and shorter length of hospital stay. Bile reflux remains a major limitation. Level of evidence IV. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
status
publication date
published in
Identity
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
PubMed ID
Additional document info
has global citation frequency
start page
end page
volume