As lonely as the moon? When and how health beliefs of COVID-19 affect mental health, life satisfaction and performance Academic Article in Scopus uri icon

abstract

  • Purpose: Drawing on the health belief model and affective events theory, the main objectives of this study are to: (1) analyze which health beliefs about COVID-19 (probability, seriousness and worry) trigger feelings of social isolation; (2) investigate whether psychological capital buffers the escalation of social isolation and (3) analyze the role of the feelings of social isolation as a mechanism that yields drawbacks on mental health, life satisfaction and performance. Design/methodology/approach: Data came from two waves of online surveys administered to 678 employees of a private university in Mexico. Findings: Results of structural equation modeling showed that beliefs of worry of getting COVID-19 trigger social isolation feelings, which, in turn, yields drawbacks on mental health, life satisfaction and performance (i.e. task, creative and organizational citizenship behavior). Moreover, psychological capital buffers the increases in feelings of social isolation generated by beliefs of the COVID-19 severity. Practical implications: This study provides insightful recommendations for handling future events that might imply social restrictions as a measure of contagion containment. Originality/value: We contribute to Affective Events literature by linking it to the health belief model. A main criticism of affective events theory is its exogenous blindness and lack of attention to how affect reactions are triggered at work. We address this limitation by bridging health belief model and affective events theory to show what specific health beliefs of COVID-19 produce affects and behavioral reactions in employees. © 2025, Emerald Publishing Limited.

publication date

  • January 1, 2025