The accreditation of engineering programs is a critical mechanism for ensuring academic quality and alignment with professional standards. However, managing the simultaneous accreditation of multiple programs presents significant organizational and operational challenges. This paper presents a case study of the coordinated reaccreditation of four engineering programs under the criteria of the Consejo de Acreditación de la Enseñanza de la Ingeniería (CACEI). The proposed approach is based on a centralized-collaborative governance model that integrates structured planning, standardized tools, and continuous coordination while preserving academic ownership at the program level. The methodology includes the use of common reporting templates, a shared institutional timeline, and regular coordination meetings to ensure alignment and consistent progress across programs. Additionally, targeted strategies were implemented to address challenges such as faculty workload and fragmented evidence systems, including the consolidation of documentation into a centralized repository and the provision of continuous training for stakeholders. The effectiveness of the approach is reflected in the accreditation outcomes: all four programs obtained the maximum six-year accreditation period awarded by CACEI, along with a reduction in identified weaknesses compared to previous accreditation cycles. These results suggest that the integration of centralized coordination with distributed academic responsibility can improve process efficiency, consistency, and institutional alignment. The findings contribute a scalable model for managing multiple accreditation processes in higher education institutions.
