Standardized objective exam vs. high fidelity simulation: Two models, same content

© 2020 The Authors.The evaluation of learning is becoming more relevant in medical education institutions, which has led to a rethinking of the design, application, and research of the process itself. In this study, we conducted A quantitative study with a quasi-experimental design utilizing pre-test and post-test. Twenty medical students enrolled in two classes (groups) in the subject of Respiratory Physiopathology in the Surgeon Medical Program of the School of Medicine and Health Sciences at Tecnologico de Monterrey participated. Three variables were used: 1) the student experience with the evaluation process, 2) learning engagement and 3) burnout syndrome. Three assessment techniques were applied in each group. In both groups, the Portfolio and the Written Examination were generic. The distinction between the two groups was in the application of the third tool. The PEE class (8 students) received the "Standardized Objective Examination." The PSE class (12 students) received the "High Fidelity Simulation." The results indicated that both techniques promoted a sense of student satisfaction, representing an opportunity to demonstrate the development of their competencies. However, in the results of the final overall knowledge review, it was noted that the PEE Group scored higher. Each method offers its advantages in both the assessment and the learning itself. Their utilization will depend on the availability of each institution to define its use according to their goals.

Standardized objective exam vs. high fidelity simulation: Two models, same content Academic Article in Scopus